Sunday, May 5, 2024
ADVT 
Reviews

Edmunds: 2023 Volvo XC40 Recharge vs. Audi Q4 e-tron

Darpan News Desk The Canadian Press, 12 Apr, 2023 10:16 AM
  • Edmunds: 2023 Volvo XC40 Recharge vs. Audi Q4 e-tron

With its original e-tron, Audi was one of the first luxury European automakers to offer an electric vehicle. Last year, it expanded its lineup with the more affordable Q4 e-tron. Slotting between two gas-powered models, the smaller Q3 and the larger Q5, the Q4 e-tron is an all-electric compact luxury SUV. It has a lot going for it but it’s not the only small European luxury EV vying for your attention. Another top option is the Volvo XC40 Recharge. It’s based on the brand’s stylish XC40 but is powered by electricity instead of gasoline. The car experts at Edmunds compare them to find out which one is the better buy.

PERFORMANCE AND RANGE Audi offers the Q4 e-tron in two powertrain configurations: a single-motor base version that makes 201 horsepower and a dual-motor all-wheel-drive setup good for 295 horsepower. The latter variant accelerated from 0 to 60 mph in a respectable 5.7 seconds in Edmunds’ testing. It also delivered responsive handling and proved to be plenty maneuverable in tight parking lots.

The XC40 Recharge is also agile and tossable, but it has the bonus of being significantly more powerful. The XC40 Recharge is offered in a single impressive configuration: a dual-motor all-wheel-drive layout with 402 horsepower. Not surprisingly, the Volvo was quicker in testing, needing just 4.5 seconds to reach 60 mph. Additionally, the XC40 Recharge offers a full one-pedal driving mode that allows it to come to a stop without the driver touching the brake pedal. In the Audi, you still have to touch the brakes to fully stop.

On paper, the XC40 Recharge’s 223-mile battery range is disappointing. The similarly priced Tesla Model Y Long Range, for example, has an EPA-estimated range of 317 miles. That said, the small Volvo SUV performed better in Edmunds’ real-world range tests. A 2021 model with a lower 208-mile EPA estimate managed to travel 240 miles, so you can likely expect a newer one with the higher estimated range to exceed that. A dual-motor Q4 e-tron has an EPA-estimated range of up to 242 miles and was also able to beat that in Edmunds’ testing, going 270 miles. The single-motor Q4 e-tron, which Edmunds hasn’t range-tested, offers the most of the group here, with an EPA-estimated 265 miles.

This category comes down to personal preference. The Audi can likely go farther on a single charge, but the Volvo is more entertaining to drive.

Winner: tie

INTERIOR AND TECH The Q4 e-tron’s cabin is proof that Audi knows how to design an interior. It’s modern and classy with a distinct upscale feel. For the most part, the materials are top-notch, though there are some hard plastics that feel out of place. The wide 11.6-inch central touchscreen is responsive and has menus that are easy to navigate. There’s also an available premium audio system tuned by speaker manufacturer Sonos that provides an immersive listening experience.

The XC40 Recharge’s interior is cleanly designed with premium touches that are understated but noticeable once you’re sitting inside. The seats are comfortable but might not feel luxurious enough for some. The XC40 Recharge uses a Google-based in-car operating system that integrates many apps like Google Maps, Spotify and the voice-controlled Google Assistant. These features can be pretty handy but require a steady data connection to work at their best.

Both electric SUVs are fairly spacious for their size. The cargo room behind the rear seats is about the same, but one advantage the Volvo enjoys over the Audi is a small front trunk or “frunk” that can fit a small bag or other odds and ends. It’s a close call, but Audi’s interior wins for its poshness and less finicky infotainment setup.

Winner: Audi Q4 e-tron

PRICING AND VALUE The Audi has the lower starting price at $50,995, but with the base Q4 40 e-tron you have to make do with far less power than the Volvo, which starts around $55,000. But if you want to load up either model with some of the premium features you’d want in a luxury car, the XC40 tops out for less money. While the Audi Q4 50 e-tron is a closer match in terms of power, it quickly eclipses the XC40 in price and makes less power than its Scandinavian rival.

Warranty coverage is about the same for both, though the Volvo includes two years of free maintenance. Neither qualifies for a federal tax credit under the latest legislation.

Winner: XC40 Recharge Electric

EDMUNDS SAYS Between these two EVs, we’d pick the XC40 for its quicker acceleration, adequate real-world range, and comfortable and stylish interior. But if your main priority is range, you’d likely be better served by the Q4 e-tron.

 

MORE Reviews ARTICLES

Edmunds Compares: 2023 Toyota Prius vs. 2023 Kia Niro

Edmunds Compares: 2023 Toyota Prius vs. 2023 Kia Niro
The Kia Niro has been on the market since 2016, and like the Prius, it was also redesigned for the 2023 model year. The new Niro sports a stylish bold design, excellent technology and a roomier interior. But is Kia’s hybrid good enough to take on the long-running Prius? Edmunds experts compare them to find out which one is the better buy.

Edmunds Compares: 2023 Toyota Prius vs. 2023 Kia Niro

Edmunds: Edmunds Compares: 2023 BMW iX vs. 2023 Rivian R1S

Edmunds: Edmunds Compares: 2023 BMW iX vs. 2023 Rivian R1S
The BMW iX and Rivian R1S are two electric SUVs that require no compromise, combining stellar performance and long-distance capability with plenty of convenience and tech features. Which one is the best for your money? The vehicle experts at Edmunds compare both to find out.

Edmunds: Edmunds Compares: 2023 BMW iX vs. 2023 Rivian R1S

Edmunds: The most affordable EVs for 2023

Edmunds: The most affordable EVs for 2023
Edmunds has assembled a roster of five affordable options for 2023 sorted by price. Some of these models will further qualify for federal tax credits that now require American assembly and parts sourcing.

Edmunds: The most affordable EVs for 2023

Edmunds: Honda CR-V Hybrid vs Kia Sportage Hybrid

Edmunds: Honda CR-V Hybrid vs Kia Sportage Hybrid
They’re also more powerful and have the same interior space. Altogether, it’s pretty easy to justify the slight price premiums that the hybrid CR-V and Sportage command. But which SUV should you get?    

Edmunds: Honda CR-V Hybrid vs Kia Sportage Hybrid

Edmunds: What to know before towing with an electric pickup

Edmunds: What to know before towing with an electric pickup
A 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning with its extended-range battery has an EPA-estimated range of up to 320 miles on a full charge. That’s solid for a modern EV. But it pales in comparison to a gas-powered F-150, which can have a range upward of 500 miles on a full tank.

Edmunds: What to know before towing with an electric pickup

2023 Toyota Corolla Cross

2023 Toyota Corolla Cross
The 10-way power-adjustable heated driver’s seat is comfortable and supportive and for 2023 a next-generation Toyota Multimedia infotainment system is standard showcasing an eight-inch touchscreen and wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay connectivity. While an improvement over the outgoing technology it’s not the most intuitive offering on the market. 

2023 Toyota Corolla Cross