Saturday, May 30, 2026
ADVT 
Health

India-Born Scientist's Team Develops Blood Test For Early Cancer Detection

IANS, 24 Feb, 2015 12:59 PM
    Researchers in the US, led by an India-born physician scientist, have said they have developed a new blood test that has the potential to detect cancers in their earliest stages.
     
    In a proof-of-principle study, researchers from Stanford University, with Sanjiv Gambhir as the lead author, administered a drug called DNA minicircles to mice and found mice with tumours produced a substance that tumour-free mice did not make and was easily detected 48 hours later in the blood.
     
    The technique "represents an alternative paradigm for improved cancer detection", said the paper published in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Monday. 
     
    "If proven safe and effective, (it) eventually may have potential as a powerful cancer-screening tool for the general population," Xinhua news agency quoted the paper as stating.
     
    The hunt for cancer "biomarkers" in the blood, or substances that indicate a probable tumour, is nothing new, but various tumour types naturally secrete characteristic substances with each requiring its own separate test, said Gambhir, chair of radiology and director of the Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection.
     
    Complicating matters, these substances are also quite often made in healthy tissues, so a positive test result did not absolutely mean a person actually has cancer. In addition, a tumour, especially a small one, simply may not secrete enough of the trademark substance to be detectable.
     
    Gambhir's team found a way to force any of numerous tumour types to produce a biomarker whose presence in the blood of mice unambiguously signifies cancer, because none of the rodents' tissues would normally be making it.
     
    "This biomarker is a protein called secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP)," they said in a statement. "SEAP is naturally produced in human embryos as they form and develop, but it's not present in adults."
     
    To trick mice's cancer cells into making SEAP and squirting it into the bloodstream, Gambhir and his colleagues used a DNA minicircle, which is a tiny, artificial, single-stranded DNA ring about 4,000 nucleotides in circumference, or roughly one-millionth as long as the DNA strand that would result from stretching all 23 chromosomes of the human genome end to end.
     
    They engineered the DNA minicircle so that it can be activated by a particular promoter, a short DNA sequence that only works in cancer cells. When activated, a reporter gene on the minicircle will produce the protein called SEAP, which can be detected in the bloodstream.
     
    Then the researchers injected the minicircles intravenously into mice bearing human melanoma metastases and tumor-free mice and measured SEAP levels in the animals' blood one, three, seven, 11 and 14 days later.
     
    Within 48 hours, SEAP was present in the blood of mice with tumours, but not in that of the tumour-free animals. That signal began declining in strength as early as 72 hours post-injection, fading to insignificance within the next two weeks or so.
     
    "Its maximum strength varied with the total tumour volume in a mouse's lungs, suggesting that the test may be sensitive not only to the presence of cancer but also to its extent," they said.
     
    Although the minicircles were injected intravenously to the mice in this study, it should eventually prove possible to deliver them orally via a pill, Gambhir, born in Ambala, India, and a recipient of numerous awards and honours, said. 
     
    "We haven't got it down to a pill yet, but the oral delivery part of this is likely a solvable problem -- only a few years off, not five or 10 years off," he said, noting it would take much more time than that to prove that the approach is safe to use in humans.

    MORE Health ARTICLES

    Anti-smoking TV ads with anger more effective

    Anti-smoking TV ads with anger more effective
    Anger works better than sadness in anti-smoking television advertisements that appeal to viewers emotions.  

    Anti-smoking TV ads with anger more effective

    What! Even a man's odour can make rats stressed!

    What! Even a man's odour can make rats stressed!
    Know why, to the delight of your spouse, that stubborn mouse runs the moment he sees you entering the house from office? Because even the smell of a man could elicit fear in mice and rats, a fascinating research has revealed.

    What! Even a man's odour can make rats stressed!

    Royal children were mummified next to pharaohs: Study

    Royal children were mummified next to pharaohs: Study
    The pharaohs, or rulers of ancient Egypt, even got their children and infants mummified close to them, revealed a new excavation in the Valley of the Kings close to the city of Luxor.

    Royal children were mummified next to pharaohs: Study

    Those living in affluent nations more stressed out: Study

    Those living in affluent nations more stressed out: Study
    “Life in an affluent country is more fast-paced, and there are just so many things that you have to do - leading to stress,” Louis Tay, an assistant professor of psychology at Indiana-based Purdue University, was quoted as saying.

    Those living in affluent nations more stressed out: Study

    Sexual conflict over mating affects women more: Study

    Sexual conflict over mating affects women more: Study
    In experiments on beetles, British researchers at University of Exeter used artificial selection and mating crosses among selection lines to determine if and how mating behaviours co-evolve with parental care behaviours.

    Sexual conflict over mating affects women more: Study

    Mind vs body: What is a better lie detector?

    Mind vs body: What is a better lie detector?
    To know if the person in front of you is lying, you may rely a lot on your instincts as more than the conscious mind, the body may act as a better lie detector, suggests a study.

    Mind vs body: What is a better lie detector?