Tuesday, December 23, 2025
ADVT 
India

Kashmir killings: Army apology has not dampened public anger

Darpan News Desk IANS, 11 Nov, 2014 10:09 AM
    The recent killing of two people, including a teenager, by soldiers of the Indian Army has renewed calls for the revocation of the law that gives special powers to the armed forces in the insurgency-hit Jammu and Kashmir.
     
    The man on the street views the incident, for which the army has issued an unusual apology, as a manifestation of the controversial Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) that gives sweeping powers to the armed forces in the state that is inching towards peace after decades of Pakistan-sponsored proxy war.
     
    But the apology has done little to defuse the anger among the people in the Kashmir Valley over the killings, particularly in Nowgam area in Srinagar peripheries where the two belonged to.
     
    Faisal Bhat, 14, and Mehrajuddin Dar, 21, were killed early this month when soldiers of the counter-insurgency 53 Rashtriya Rifles opened fire at the car in which they were travelling in Chattergam village, some 20 km from Srinagar. Two of their friends, Shaker Bhat and Zahid Naqash who were also in the car, were injured in the shooting, described by the army as "mistaken identity" in their chase for "terrorists".
     
    Crowds in the Nowgam area have been holding protests, albeit peacefully, barring a couple of incidents of stone pelting over the weekend. They want the government to punish the "guilty" soldiers.
     
    And to stop such incidents from recurring, they said, the dreaded AFSPA in place since 1990s, should go. Showkat Ahmad, 38, a businessman in Srinagar, said the incident in not a "one-off".
     
    "There is nothing new in it. This has been going on from years and will continue to happen in the future if the special powers the army enjoys are not revoked," Ahmad told IANS.
     
    Shabir Ahmad, 23, a young journalist who has been reporting the conflict for the last couple of years, said that probes into past civilian killings allegedly by the Indian Army are yet to be completed and the "recent case will only add to the lot".
     
    "No doubt the army has admitted the wrongdoing. But history has a long list of probes still pending. I doubt that the justice can be done," said Shabir.
     
    Qazi Mudasir, 25, a social activist from Srinagar, said that by official admission of the state and central governments, the circumstances that forced the implementation of the draconian law no longer exist in the Muslim-majority state of some 10.25 million people.
     
    The state government took the army's help after police and paramilitary forces failed to curb the reign of terror unleashed by Pakistani and Pakistan-trained militants, including foreign mercenaries, who were growing in numbers and strength.
     
    But the governments have admitted that the situation is no longer that dangerous and militants are present few in numbers, and that too scattered around in rural or forested areas.
     
    Mudasir, like many others whom IANS spoke with, was of the view that military presence has to be reduced in areas insurgency has been eliminated, including in cities and towns. "Until there is the presence of army here, such incidents will continue to happen," said the social activist.
     
    But the army, which has announced Rs.10 lakh compensation to the kin of each of the deceased and Rs.5 lakh each for the injured, says that the AFSPA has nothing to do with the killing of the two people in the recent incident.

    MORE India ARTICLES

    BJP alleges graft in Vadra deals, Priyanka Gandhi hits back

    BJP alleges graft in Vadra deals, Priyanka Gandhi hits back
    The verbal spat between the Congress and the BJP grew more strident Sunday with the BJP's allegations of "corruption under patronage" in land deals of Congress chief Sonia Gandhi's son-in-law Robert Vadra evoked a spirited response from his wife Priyanka Gandhi, who accused the party of "running like bewildered rats".

    BJP alleges graft in Vadra deals, Priyanka Gandhi hits back

    Varanasi battle to save the country: Arvind Kejriwal

    Varanasi battle to save the country: Arvind Kejriwal
    AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal said that his fight against BJP prime ministerial nominee Narendra Modi is not a "battle of prestige" but one to save the country from corrupt forces.

    Varanasi battle to save the country: Arvind Kejriwal

    For Rahul, poverty is a matter of fun: Modi

    For Rahul, poverty is a matter of fun: Modi
    Ridiculing Rahul Gandhi, BJP's prime ministerial nominee Narendra Modi Sunday said that for the Congress vice president, poverty was a "matter of fun" as he had never experienced any such thing in his life.

    For Rahul, poverty is a matter of fun: Modi

    Punjab Congress president proposes death penalty for drug smugglers

    Punjab Congress president proposes death penalty for drug smugglers
     Punjab Congress president Pratap Singh Bajwa Sunday said that he would bring in a legislation proposing death penalty for those indulging in drugs trade.

    Punjab Congress president proposes death penalty for drug smugglers

    Kashmir will not remain part of a communal India: Farooq Abdullah

    Kashmir will not remain part of a communal India: Farooq Abdullah
    National Conference (NC) patron and Srinagar Lok Sabha candidate Farooq Abdullah said Sunday that Jammu and Kashmir would not remain a part of India if the country becomes communal, while asking those who vote for Narendra Modi to "drown themselves".

    Kashmir will not remain part of a communal India: Farooq Abdullah

    Army chief's appointment: Need for restraint and consensus

    Army chief's appointment: Need for restraint and consensus
    Even as India is going through the last phase of a critical and intensely contested general election, which hopefully will lead to a new government in Delhi by late May, the appointment of a new army chief to succeed General Bikram Singh who retires on July 31 has become the focus of a potentially damaging controversy

    Army chief's appointment: Need for restraint and consensus