Wednesday, June 10, 2026
ADVT 
India

Tuition fee should always be affordable, education not a business: SC

Darpan News Desk IANS, 08 Nov, 2022 01:03 PM
  • Tuition fee should always be affordable, education not a business: SC

New Delhi, Nov 8 (IANS) The Supreme Court has said that tuition fee should always be affordable and education is not a business to earn profit, as it upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment to quash the state government's decision to enhance the tuition fee in medical colleges to Rs 24 lakh per annum.

A bench of Justices M.R. Shah and Sudhanshu Dhulia said to enhance the fee unilaterally would be contrary to the objects and purpose of Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983 as well as the Rules, 2006 and the decision of this court in the case of P.A. Inamdar.

"To enhance the fee to Rs 24 lakh per annum i.e., seven times more than the fee fixed earlier was not justifiable at all. Education is not the business to earn profit. The tuition fee shall always be affordable," it said in its judgment on Monday.

The bench said the determination of fee or review of fee should be within the parameters of the fixation rules and shall have direct nexus on the factors mentioned in Rule 4 of the Rules, 2006, namely,(a) location of the professional institution; (b) the nature of the professional course; (c) the cost of available infrastructure;(d) the expenditure on administration and maintenance; (e) a reasonable surplus required for growth and development of the professional Institution; (f) the revenue foregone on account of waiver of fee, if any, in respect of students belonging to the reserved category and other economically weaker sections of the society.

The bench said: "All the aforesaid factors are required to be considered by the AFRC (Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee) while determining/reviewing the tuition fees. Therefore, the High Court is absolutely justified in quashing and setting aside G.O. dated September 6, 2017."

The top court imposed Rs 5 lakh cost on the petitioner, Narayana Medical College, and Andhra Pradesh to be deposited with the court registry within a period of six weeks.

The bench said the medical colleges are the beneficiaries of the illegal GO (government order), which was rightly set aside by the high court. "The respective medical colleges have used/utilised the amount recovered under GO. dated 06.09.2017 for a number of years and kept with them for a number of years on the other hand students paid the exorbitant tuition fee after obtaining loan from the financial institutions/banks and paid the higher rate of interest," said the bench.

The top court made these observations while dismissing a plea filed by a medical college challenging the high court judgment.

"If at all the AFRC determines/fixes the tuition fee which is higher than the tuition fee fixed earlier, it will be always open for the medical colleges to recover the same from the concerned students, however, the respective medical colleges cannot be permitted to retain the amount collected illegally pursuant to G.O. dated 06.09.2017," it said.

The high court had held that considering the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Admission and Fee Regulatory Committee (for Professional Courses offered in Private Un-Aided Professional Institutions) Rules, 2006, the fee cannot be enhanced/fixed without the recommendations/report of the committee.

Photo courtesy of IStock. 

MORE India ARTICLES

Ayodhya Verdict In Supreme Court: Disputed Land To Be Given For Temple, Separate Plot For Mosque

The Lucknow Bench of the High Court, on September 30, 2010, held that Hindus and Muslims as joint title holders of the disputed land.    

Ayodhya Verdict In Supreme Court: Disputed Land To Be Given For Temple, Separate Plot For Mosque

Ayodhya Verdict: Anonymous Judge Cites Guru Nanak, Tulsidas To Back Hindu Faith

"The visit of Guru Nanak Devji in 1510-11 A.D. to have darshan of Lord Ram's birthplace does support the faith and belief of the Hindus," said the anonymous judge who believed that faith of the Hindus was important.

Ayodhya Verdict: Anonymous Judge Cites Guru Nanak, Tulsidas To Back Hindu Faith

'I Stand Vindicated, Moment Of Fulfilment For Me': LK Advani On Ayodhya Verdict

'I Stand Vindicated, Moment Of Fulfilment For Me': LK Advani On Ayodhya Verdict
In a statement, the former Deputy Prime Minister said it was "gratifying" that the belief and sentiments of crores of countrymen have been respected.    

'I Stand Vindicated, Moment Of Fulfilment For Me': LK Advani On Ayodhya Verdict

Ayodhya Verdict: How UP Police Curbed Hate Speech On Social Media

Ayodhya Verdict: How UP Police Curbed Hate Speech On Social Media
The UP Police ensured well in advance that no WhatsApp groups in the communally-sensitive areas were able to post fake, mischievous or hate messages and disturb the law and order situation, Ashutosh Pandey, Additional Director General (ADG),

Ayodhya Verdict: How UP Police Curbed Hate Speech On Social Media

SC Took Note Of Travelogues To Cement Hindus' Claim On Ayodhya Land

The Supreme Court, in its judgement in the Ayodhya title suit, took note of travelogues of Joseph Tiefenthaler and William Finch regarding the history of the disputed site.    

SC Took Note Of Travelogues To Cement Hindus' Claim On Ayodhya Land

No Better Verdict Could Have Come Out: Ex-ASI Top Official K.k. Muhammed

Former archaeologist K.K. Muhammed, who headed the North Division of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has said that Saturday's judgement is "ultimate and nothing better could have come out."

No Better Verdict Could Have Come Out: Ex-ASI Top Official K.k. Muhammed