Friday, December 26, 2025
ADVT 
International

Revocation Of Article 370 Could Trigger India-Pak War: Imran Khan

Darpan News Desk IANS, 06 Aug, 2019 08:39 PM

    Prime Minister Imran Khan on Tuesday expressed apprehension that Pulwama-like attacks can follow the revocation of the special status for Jammu and Kashmir, which could trigger a conventional war between Pakistan and India.


    “This will be a war that no one will win and the implications will be global,” he warned while addressing a rare joint sitting of Parliament that was convened to discuss the Kashmir situation, a day after the Indian government revoked Article 370 which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir.

     


    India maintains that Jammu and Kashmir is its integral part and it includes Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

     

    Prime Minister Khan explained how the war-like scenario could erupt in the middle of the current tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours.


    He said Kashmiris would protest and India would launch a crackdown on them.


    Khan said with this approach, “attacks like Pulwama are bound to happen again. I can already predict this will happen. They will attempt to place the blame on us again. They may strike us again, and we will strike back.”


    “What will happen then? Who will win that war? No one will win it and it will have grievous consequences for the entire world. This is not nuclear blackmail,” Khan told the lawmakers.


    He urged the international community to take notice of the situation in Kashmir.


    “What they did in Kashmir is in accordance with their ideology…They have a racist ideology,” Khan alleged. “Theirs is the ideology which killed Mahatma Gandhi. If the world does not act and does not uphold its own laws then we will not be responsible.”

    Khan said that his government would approach the world leaders and apprise them of situation in Kashmir.


    “We will fight it at every forum including the UN Security Council,” he said, adding that Pakistan also plans to take the matter to the International Court of Justice.


    Khan said he tried to improve ties and all neighbours, including India, but New Delhi refused to respond to his overtures.


    “When I first reached out to India, they expressed concerns that there were militant outfits operating from Pakistan. I told (Narendra) Modi that after the grave and painful tragedy of the Army Public School massacre, all our political parties had resolved to never let the territory of Pakistan be used for terrorist activities.


    “But I got the feeling that the Indian side was not serious about talks. When we went to Bishkek (for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit), my suspicions regarding their unwillingness to speak was strengthened,” Khan said.


    He said that India “took our overtures for peace as weakness, so we stopped extending offers to hold talks”.


    Responding to criticism by Opposition leader Shehbaz Sharif, who said that the government should give tough response to India, Khan asked, “What opposition leader wants? Should I order an attack on India?”


    Shehbaz earlier said that Khan should use his leadership to lead the case of Kashmir at this critical juncture.


    “We have two options: either we hide or we take decisive action. Hiding is not an option, we must take decisive action,” he said.


    Bilawal Bhutto Zardari of Pakistan Peoples Party also urged for strong action to counter the Indian move.


    Earlier, the joint sitting was marred due to differences between treasury and opposition over language of resolution against India.


    After the start of the meeting, Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Azam Khan Swati presented the resolution, condemning “violation” of the Line of Control (LoC) by India, but it did not mention the revocation of Article 370.


    Opposition lawmakers staged protest at the omission and threatened to boycott which prompted National Assembly Speaker Asad Qaisar to adjourn the session with the promise to reconvene shortly after amending the resolution.


    The session was convened after four hours when Prime Minister Khan agreed give a policy statement.

    MORE International ARTICLES

    PICS: Sikh Soldier Statue Honouring Sikh Sacrifices Vandalised After Less Than A Week In UK

      A statue of a Sikh soldier honouring South Asian soldiers' role in the First World War, which was unveiled less than a week ago has been vandalised.

    PICS: Sikh Soldier Statue Honouring Sikh Sacrifices Vandalised After Less Than A Week In UK

    Melbourne Terror: Knifeman Dead After Stabbing Leaves 1 Dead, Car Fire - WATCH

    A stabbing incident in Melbourne this afternoon that has left one person deceased is being treated as terror related at this stage.

    Melbourne Terror: Knifeman Dead After Stabbing Leaves 1 Dead, Car Fire - WATCH

    25-Yr-Old Surrey Resident Nicolas Karvouniaris Charged In Fatal Collision

    The Surrey RCMP Criminal Collision Investigation Team is continuing its investigation into the fatal collision that occurred just after midnight on November 4, 2018.

    25-Yr-Old Surrey Resident Nicolas Karvouniaris Charged In Fatal Collision

    A 69-Year-Old Dutch Man Wants To Officially Lower His Age By 20 Years To Get More Dates

    "When I'm on Tinder and it says I'm 69, I don't get an answer. When I'm 49, with the face I have, I will be in a luxurious position," said 69-year-old Emile Ratelband.

    A 69-Year-Old Dutch Man Wants To Officially Lower His Age By 20 Years To Get More Dates

    Empire State Building Lights Up In Orange To Celebrate Diwali

    Diwali 2018: At the November 7 ceremony, Miss America 2014 Nina Devuluri and popular singer Jay Sean along with Srujal Parikh flipped the switch to turn on the orange lights on top of the Empire State Building.

    Empire State Building Lights Up In Orange To Celebrate Diwali

    Accosting Acosta: Will President Pay Political Price For Banning CNN Reporter Jim Acosta?

    WASHINGTON — One dramatic White House expulsion might have gotten much of the attention Thursday, but there's been another that free-speech advocates say must not be ignored: the banning of CNN reporter Jim Acosta.

    Accosting Acosta: Will President Pay Political Price For Banning CNN Reporter Jim Acosta?