Wednesday, April 8, 2026
ADVT 
National

Judge issues reasons for rejecting Meng evidence

Darpan News Desk The Canadian Press, 21 Jul, 2021 03:12 PM
  • Judge issues reasons for rejecting Meng evidence

 A B.C. Supreme Court judge says she won't allow proposed new evidence in Meng Wanzhou's extradition case because it doesn't "expressly" support the Huawei executive's claim that the United States' case against her is "manifestly unreliable."

Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes ruled July 9 against admitting the evidence but her reasons for the judgment were not released until Wednesday. 

Meng is wanted in the United States on allegations that she misled HSBC about Huawei's relationship with another company, putting the bank at risk of violating U.S. sanctions against Iran — charges that both she and Huawei deny. 

Meng's legal team argued that the documents undermine the allegations of fraud against Meng, proving the United States misled the court in its summary to Canada of the case against her.

The documents recently obtained by Meng's legal team from HSBC through a court agreement in Hong Kong include internal email chains and spreadsheets.

Holmes says in the ruling that while the documents would "no doubt be valuable to Meng in a trial," they don't expressly state Meng's conclusion, which can only be reached through inferences. 

"It is only inferences from the documents that support those facts or conclusions, and they are not the only reasonable inferences the documents support," Holmes writes in the ruling. 

The documents are also not capable of showing that the inferences made by the United States in its summary of allegations against Meng were unreasonable, she says. 

Holmes says that weighing competing inferences falls in the jurisdiction of a trial, not an extradition hearing. 

"Competing potential inferences may or may not play an important part in the trial, where witnesses will testify and be cross-examined, and the body of evidence will be far more complete," she writes. 

"In the context of an extradition hearing, the true or most appropriate inference cannot be determined."

The final two to three weeks of hearings in Meng's extradition case are scheduled to begin Aug. 3.

MORE National ARTICLES

Canadians wary of AstraZeneca vaccine: Poll

Canadians wary of AstraZeneca vaccine: Poll
Just 53 per cent of respondents to the poll, conducted by Leger and the Association for Canadian Studies, said they would trust the AstraZeneca vaccine being given to themselves or family members to immunize them against the coronavirus that causes COVID-19.

Canadians wary of AstraZeneca vaccine: Poll

Ottawa extends anti-ISIL mission another year

Ottawa extends anti-ISIL mission another year
The Liberal government previously set a cap of 850 troops for the mission several years ago, but Canada had been slowly withdrawing troops from the region over the last year.

Ottawa extends anti-ISIL mission another year

Pfizer to double vaccine deliveries in June

Pfizer to double vaccine deliveries in June
Pfizer is going to send five million more vaccine doses to Canada in June than it previously planned, and AstraZeneca will ship 4.4 million doses by the end of June.

Pfizer to double vaccine deliveries in June

U.S. breaking international law: Meng's lawyer

U.S. breaking international law: Meng's lawyer
Gib van Ert told a British Columbia Supreme Court judge today that if Canada extradites her to face the charges, it will be guilty of breaking international law as well.

U.S. breaking international law: Meng's lawyer

West Kelowna RCMP investigate stabbing

West Kelowna RCMP investigate stabbing
On March 28th, 2021 just before 2:00 a.m., West Kelowna RCMP and Kelowna RCMP were called to the Postill Lake Road area for a report of multiple victims of a stabbing at an outdoor gathering.

West Kelowna RCMP investigate stabbing

A look at the rare blood clot condition VIPIT

A look at the rare blood clot condition VIPIT
The National Advisory Committee on Immunization says the vaccine should not be used by people younger than age of 55, while Health Canada has issued guidelines around what to look for if you suspect you have had an adverse reaction.

A look at the rare blood clot condition VIPIT